Debunking the top 5 myths about securing APIs


APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) are crucial in today’s digital landscape, enabling seamless integration and communication between systems and applications. However, several myths and misconceptions surrounding API security can leave businesses vulnerable to attacks.

By debunking these myths and clearly understanding the realities, organizations can implement robust API security measures to protect their valuable data and avoid detrimental consequences. In this article, we will explore the top five myths about securing APIs and shed light on the realities behind them.

Myth 1: API Gateways, Existing IAM Tools, and WAFs are Enough to Secure APIs

Reality: While API gateways, IAM tools, and Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) are essential components of API security, relying solely on them is insufficient. API gateways provide visibility, access control, and routing capabilities but are often not built specifically for security purposes. They primarily serve integration needs rather than comprehensive API protection.

Furthermore, API gateways and WAFs effectively secure north-south traffic, but they fall short when securing east-west API traffic. Additionally, these tools may lack the ability to discover all API endpoints and offer limited visibility into different data types. Therefore, they should be part of a broader, multi-layered API-specific security solution that addresses emerging threats effectively.

Myth 2: API Security is Simple

Reality: While the underlying concept of APIs is simple, ensuring API security is complex. APIs expose data and digital assets, making them attractive targets for attackers. In many cases, organizations lack complete visibility into their APIs, leading to shadow APIs that can be exploited. This expands the attack surface and highlights the need for advanced API security solutions to protect against evolving threats.

Myth 3: Developers Will Always Bake Security into APIs

Reality: Developers do not automatically prioritize security when designing APIs. While the shift-left approach encourages early identification and remediation of security gaps during development, it does not guarantee secure-by-design APIs. Developers may not have API-specific testing tools at their disposal or may not be aware of the latest best practices. To build secure APIs, organizations should invest in API security solutions, integrate them early in the development lifecycle, and continuously educate developers on security best practices.

Myth 4: Cloud Providers Secure APIs by Default

Reality: While cloud providers offer some level of security for their infrastructure, securing APIs within the cloud environment remains a shared responsibility. Cloud providers may provide basic API gateways or management tools, but organizations are responsible for securing the data and applications they run on the cloud. To ensure comprehensive API security, businesses should invest in multi-layered security solutions tailored to their needs.

Myth 5: Zero Trust is Enough to Secure APIs

Reality: Relying solely on a zero-trust approach is insufficient for API security. Zero trust architectures focus on restricting access, but APIs require access to function properly. Attackers can exploit vulnerabilities, including hijacking authenticated sessions. While zero trust principles are valuable, organizations must complement them with other security measures such as robust authentication mechanisms, encryption, and continuous monitoring to effectively secure APIs.


By dispelling API security myths, organizations can adopt a proactive approach to protect their APIs, data, and digital assets from malicious attacks. It is crucial to recognize that API gateways, IAM tools, and WAFs are components of a broader security solution, and their effectiveness should be complemented with API-specific security measures. Emphasizing secure-by-design development practices, shared responsibility in cloud environments, and a multi-layered security approach will enable organizations to safeguard their APIs and mitigate risks effectively. By prioritizing API security, businesses can maintain their reputation and customer trust, and avoid the financial and legal consequences of API attacks.